This past week, I had the pleasure of meeting Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey and Harvard Medical School Professor of Genetics, Dr. Fred Alt. They were both in Washington, DC for the presentation of the 2015 NFCR Szent-Györgyi Prize for Progress in Cancer Research, which was awarded to Dr. Alt and keynoted by Sen. Markey.
The common theme I heard from both of these distinguished leaders was captured in a Huffington Post article written by Sam Stein, who attended the event. Stein succinctly wrote that “U.S. Science has never been more imperiled”. He noted that the lack of funding for basic scientific research not only prevents new discoveries, but it also means that we are losing promising scientists whose work can’t get funded.
10 years ago, nearly a third of qualified research was funded by NIH. Now that number is only 14% (actually even lower for oncology, near 9%). As Sen. Markey said, “sadly, support for scientific research in our country is fragile”. And when I asked Dr. Alt what his biggest concern was for the future of scientific discovery, he lamented the prospects of losing good young people from the field entirely.
Since 2003, the NIH budget has seen a 20% cut in purchasing power for new grants. It’s time to move past the ribbons, and recognize that this is not a zero sum game. As a lung cancer survivor, I care a lot about the need for research in this area. But cancer research science has evolved to where we should not be looking just at cancer type, or organ-specific research. Cancer is a genetic disease—that is, cancer is caused by changes to genes that control the way our cells function, especially how they grow and divide. These changes include mutations in the DNA that makes up our genes. Genetic changes that increase cancer risk can be inherited from our parents, and can also be acquired as the result of errors that occur as cells divide during a person’s lifetime.
Awareness is great, but we need to get serious about cancer research funding. No matter what ribbon you wear, let’s realize that we truly are ALL in this together. 30 years from now, if we have lost a generation of promising scientists due to lack of resources, what progress will we have made in the fight against cancer?